Friends Describe Feminist Icon Bella Abzug as Violent, Aggressive
January 16th, 2008 by Glenn Sacks, MA for Fathers & Families
"'I couldn't stand the screaming,' historian Amy Swerdlow remembers about Bella Abzug. 'She was just so aggressive -- assertive doesn't do it -- aggressive and carrying on.' That from Gloria Steinem. Journalist Doug Ireland recalls 'those volcanic eruptions of Abzugian temper.' 'She got so angry that she punched me,' colleague Ronnie Eldridge reports...This is how the feminist congresswoman's friends, the ones who stayed loyal to her all her life, remember her....
"She served, flamboyantly, for three terms, focused mainly on women's issues and world peace. (Although how you fight for peace while punching and yelling remains an interesting question)...Bella Abzug screamed and yelled and hit people. She was appalled when both her daughters grew up to be lesbians."
In the book review below, feminist Carolyn See reviews a biography of late feminist icon Bella Abzug. Turns out that Abzug had something of a violent streak. Imagine that.
Woman's Work
By Carolyn See,
Washington Post
December 7, 2007
BELLA ABZUG
An Oral History
By Suzanne Braun Levine and Mary Thom
Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 320 pp. $25
"I couldn't stand the screaming," historian Amy Swerdlow remembers about Bella Abzug. "She was just so aggressive -- assertive doesn't do it -- aggressive and carrying on." That from Gloria Steinem. Journalist Doug Ireland recalls "those volcanic eruptions of Abzugian temper." "She got so angry that she punched me," colleague Ronnie Eldridge reports, "on Fifth Avenue in front of De Pina's. That was the only time she ever really hit me." This is how the feminist congresswoman's friends, the ones who stayed loyal to her all her life, remember her.
Abzug was born in the Bronx of Russian Jewish immigrants who told Bella and her sister they could do anything they wanted when they grew up, and Bella took this seriously. She raised money for the Zionist state-to-be when she was just a little kid, trolling the subways with a Mason jar. When her father died, she went to the synagogue every day for a year to sing kaddish, the Hebrew prayer for the dead. Except that only guys are supposed to do that, and she was a girl, and only 12. She went on to Hunter College, where she excelled, and then to Columbia Law School -- one of the first women to be admitted there, and she was Jewish to boot.
From the very beginning of her adult life, she had trouble working for anybody and soon set up her own office. She experienced insults about her appearance (she was chunky, and put on more weight as she got older), about her abrasive voice and her abusive personality, but it seemed to roll right off her most of the time. "I'm Bella's oldest friend," Mim Kelber, her speechwriter, remembers. "She liked herself too much, but I think you need that. She was very self-confident." Except that later on, when she was a successful member of the House of Representatives, she broke down in tears at a political "roast," when a man dressed up like her with a fat, padded fanny, and another man, impersonating her long-suffering husband, came out in a frilly apron.
She began her career working as a lawyer for progressive causes that often were doomed to fail. She represented a black man who was accused of raping a white woman in Mississippi. (He said they were having a consensual affair.) The jury deliberated for a full 2 1/2 minutes and, of course, he was eventually executed. After a few disheartening events like this, Abzug got a clue. She wanted to change the world and thought she could. She ran for the House from a section of Manhattan. She served, flamboyantly, for three terms, focused mainly on women's issues and world peace. (Although how you fight for peace while punching and yelling remains an interesting question.) Then she decided -- despite good advice -- to run for the Democratic senatorial nomination against Daniel Patrick Moynihan. She made some wiseass, ill-considered remarks and lost the primary to him. She also lost a mayoral primary election and then another House election. It looked like a disastrous losing streak, but maybe it wasn't. She just kept going higher and wider, operating as a celebrity-feminist-organizer, always sporting her trademark hat, traveling all over the world addressing women's conventions, addressing the United Nations. She was ubiquitous.
It's become a tiresome platitude now that women of a certain age repeat: Their daughters and their granddaughters have not the faintest notion of what it was like before the feminist movement began in the early '60s -- how women couldn't get credit to buy anything, couldn't teach at colleges or universities, couldn't get abortions unless they had the money to leave the country or the courage to put their lives in the hands of back-street butchers. (And please, no e-mails on this. I'm against abortion on principle, but I'm not a woman of childbearing years.) Young girls in those days were advised repeatedly in women's magazines to become "good listeners," i.e., to keep their mouths shut and, of course, their legs crossed. But if they kept them crossed too determinedly, then they were labeled as "man haters," and that was bad, too.
But I'm going to add that very few people now actually remember what it was like during the period of the feminist movement. Everything was up for grabs. No one knew what to do or how to do it. Betty Friedan ruined a Super Bowl party in my very own home by wearing a black leather miniskirt and swinging her (not bad) legs clad in fishnet stockings back and forth in front of the TV screen so that nobody could see the plays. She radicalized a sizable bunch of neutral men into committed anti-feminists that day. Nobody knew what to do with these uppity, unpredictable women.
And what were they for, or against? Against the Vietnam War, of course. For legalized abortion. For equal pay for equal work. (As if!) For parity, true equality, with men. They even tried to peddle the Equal Rights Amendment, which would have given women equal rights -- what a concept! -- with men. Lots of men had conniption fits about this. If you were a second-rate fellow, who would there be for you to look down on? But lots of women hated the idea just as much. Who could they find to take care of them, if not men? The amendment never passed. And the movement began to wind down. The congresswomen of the day -- Barbara Jordan, Shirley Chisholm, Abzug -- died. Steinem got married. She's a widow now. Friedan is gone, too. All those meetings, the huge international conferences, the tiny, exciting, consciousness-raising groups -- it all simmered down. It's still a safe bet that at 80 percent of all the dinner parties in every state across the nation, women know enough to be good listeners.
Bella Abzug screamed and yelled and hit people. She was appalled when both her daughters grew up to be lesbians. She wore those goofy hats and played poker. She could be snide, but often that got passed off as cute. Her terrible, lippy mouth caught up with her, kept her out of the Senate, even out of the office of mayor. She was mean, no doubt about it. But as with Malcolm X, her extremism could have helped clear the way for at least theoretical equality between the sexes. Is all this good, or not? It's really too soon to know for sure. But Abzug was certainly a major player in our change in attitudes in the second part of the past century. The two authors here, Suzanne Braun Levine and Mary Thom, give us a fascinating glimpse into that inspirational but undeniably peculiar period that is receding, all too quickly, into the past.


























January 16th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
In all fairness, this story may be a non-starter -- because it's just so easy to cherry-pick celebrity abusers of either gender...
Just to mention two very different extremes on the male genius spectrum -- Pablo Picasso treated his wives and mistresses like crap, as apparently did Ike Turner.
Though you gotta admit that Bella might qualify as the poster girl for "angry radical feminists."
I was trying to come up with a violent celebrity lesbian (since the DV statistics indicate that intimate partner violence between lesbians is greater than that between heterosexual couples or gay male partners.)
Hillary qualifies as a known abuser (all the documented tales about her throwing objects at poor Bill), but until she comes out of the closet, I'm stumped for a solid lesbian nominee.
January 16th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Although Michael Flooood wrote a book titled Angry Men's Movement about the fathers' rights movement, I get the impression that more curse words are used on some of the feminist websites.
January 16th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
well it backs the academic studies that claim that the most violent relationship in America is Girl/girl.
January 16th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
It seems like a few years ago, there was a congresswomen who punched someone. Does anyone remember that? (yes, punched, not slapped). Actually now that I think of it, it had something to do with a security guard who would'nt let her in the Capitol building (or some government building) because she wasn't wearing the appropriate security badge - so she argued with him, then punched him.
January 16th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
That was Cynthia McKinney you are talking about from Georgia, Norman L. She punched a security guard because she walked around a security checkpoint, and then was stopped because she did so. Then she later said that she was stopped because she was black, and never admitted to any guilt in assaulting an officer who was just doing his job.
But if she were a white male representative, imagine the media outcry.
January 16th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
The woman's right to abort a developing child hit a milestone - 50,000,000 babies aborted in the U.S - though this cartoon does not blame feminists or women.
http://townhall.com/funnies/2008/01/16/9
January 16th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Mark, remember that men favour abortion too. In fact, the levels of pro-choice points of view are equal among American men and women.
If all men were against abortion, along with the current levels of women who are against it, it would be illegal.
I would also remind you that levels of abortion are higher, yes, higher in countries where it is illegal. Much like cannabis use, the legalisation of abortion has no effect on its rate, other than many more women putting their lives in danger over back-street abortions.
The answer to the abortion debate is not a simple one. I aknowledge that killing unborn children is wrong, it's hard to say that it's acceptable. But the answer must involve a balance, it must involve talking about the difference between a 3 day old gamete and an almost fully formed foetus, it must involve talking about the rights of the father, the mother, and the child. it is not a yes/no question
January 16th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
try
http://townhall.com/funnies/2008/01/16/2
January 16th, 2008 at 8:53 pm
Oh, the irony...an abusive, violent feminist's career was started trying to defend a man against false allegations:
"She began her career working as a lawyer for progressive causes that often were doomed to fail. She represented a black man who was accused of raping a white woman in Mississippi. (He said they were having a consensual affair.) The jury deliberated for a full 2 1/2 minutes and, of course, he was eventually executed."
January 16th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Re: Michael H, Michael Flood is an absolute disgrace. I remember reading an article he wrote in an Australian university newspaper a few years back. It was on something like 'how men can prevent sexual assault'. He gave men a number of pieces of advice about how to avoid committing sexual assault, including things such as never threatening to leave a relationship if the woman refuses sex. So if a man threatens to walk away if a woman won't agree to have sex, this is rape? Fancy that!
I guess by this reasoning you would have to say that a woman who threatens to end a relationship if a man doesn't buy her more things or make more money is guilty of extortion or blackmail.
January 16th, 2008 at 9:45 pm
In 2007 Harvard Medical School announced a national survey by researchers from the Centers for Disease Control that examined 11,000 men and women ages 18-28 and found women committed 71% of the non-reciprocal violence and were more likely to hit first in the reciprocal violence. Both sexes suffered significant injuries.
http://www.patienteducationcenter.org/aspx/HealthELibrary/HealthETopic.aspx?cid=M0907d
However, our feminized government and media promotes a one-side view of violence. For example this month, January 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice is promoting National Stalking Awareness Month for the Office of Violence Against Women.
http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov
The leadership at Office of Violence Against Men, by authority of the Violence Against Men Act, is silent.
January 16th, 2008 at 10:03 pm
It has always been beyond me, even before I became enlightened on men's issues, why so many people believe that women are not capable of committing the same level of violence as men. No matter how many incidents occur, no matter how many times the falsity of that notion gets rubbed in peoples' faces, they still pretend it's true.
January 17th, 2008 at 5:24 am
What were they expecting -- Audrey Hepburn? If you want graciousness and tact, I'd suggest not looking for it near feminists!
January 17th, 2008 at 9:42 am
"Although Michael Flooood wrote a book titled Angry Men's Movement about the fathers' rights movement, I get the impression that more curse words are used on some of the feminist websites."
Darn right! The fathers of these young radical feminists paid all that money so their "bright" daughters could attend some fancy liberal arts school, and the best these "women" can come with is to drop the "f" bomb everywhere. Or my favorite, when they read anything they don't like (and that typically involves stories about some male doing something), they often respond: "Ugh!"
$35,000 a year tuition and the best they can do is "f" that, or "Ugh!"
January 17th, 2008 at 10:34 am
So, what, exactly, is unusual or noteworthy about Abzug's behavior? Just another feminist day at the office ....